Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golem Relictus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete per A7 criteria. Master of Puppets  Call me MoP! ☺  05:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Golem Relictus

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article on an unreleased video game that fails to assert notability per WP:N and sources only to website. The article's creator evidently has a substantial conflict of interest, given that the username corresponds to that one of the two game designers. Lacking substantiation of real world notability through reliable secondary sourcing, this article does not meet the guidelines at WP:N. I had originally tagged this for WP:PROD, but prior CSD was contested by creator. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because it explores a fictional concept related to the above and to another unreleased game:
 * add also Another Story‎, same author, same "series" of NN blatant advertising - super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 04:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * add also Another Story‎, same author, same "series" of NN blatant advertising - super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 04:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete both as nn. No WP:RS so fails WP:V policy. Sting au  Buzz Me...   13:39, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete both unremarkable company, and blatant advertising. Obvious COI/Advertising, as there are 0 ghits other than homepage. - super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 18:57, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.