Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golems Universal Constructor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 13:14, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Golems Universal Constructor

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Software with no assertion of notability Ironholds (talk) 06:59, 25 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. In fact I think it should be a speedy delete: as the nom says, there is no assertion of notability. The article gives no independent sources. (All of the 3 external links given are to the product's web site or to a discussion forum set up by the product's publisher.) A Google search gives announcements of new versions, listings on software link sites, brief mentions of the software (frequently in wording which copies or roughly mirrors the wording on the publisher's web site), but nothing that I would call independent coverage, and certainly by no stretch of the imagination substantial independent coverage. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:43, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * There's no speedy deletion criteria for software. Ironholds (talk) 08:45, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes I know, that's why I haven't nominated it for speedy. I suppose "I think it should be a speedy delete" was the wrong wording: I really meant something like "this is as obvious a delete as would be speedy in other cases". JamesBWatson (talk) 13:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination; no indicia of importance. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:04, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.