Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gom VPN


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  13:25, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Gom VPN

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to fail WP:NSOFT. WP:BEFORE provides, well, not much: few mentions in passing, such as one sentence in PC World. Single in-depth review at a site of dubious reliability ("VPN Critic", ). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:39, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:56, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Delete I concur. The WP:AUD of VPNCritic site is debatable and it doesn't have the general interest of larger review site. I think it's more like a niche magazine and I would liken it to a fishing magazine review a specific pole, and I'd compare the pole to this software. Now if that pole was particularly notable of general interest, it'd have general discussion in depth outside of review magazines specific to the field. Graywalls (talk) 19:43, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Due to concerns expressed with regards to retention for articles of this class of product I raised a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing. Thankyou.  Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:37, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as NOTDIR and MILL, same as PureVPN. There is nothing individually notable to these, either commercially or technically. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:06, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article from VPN Pro provides somewhat significant coverage, but nothing from that website suggests that it is reliable. feminist (talk) 03:28, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete far from meeting notability criteria, no reliable sources. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 10:09, 3 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.