Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gon' E-Choo! (video game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ceradon ( talk •  contribs ) 04:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Gon&

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unable to establish notability. Game lacks significant coverage from reliable secondary sources. The1337gamer (talk) 22:39, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  The1337gamer (talk) 22:42, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

What more sources do you think are needed? Examples? Jsaiya (talk) 23:00, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. Please ping me you find more (non-English and offline) sources. – czar   23:23, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * There is a non-English article I have not added a ref to yet: (http://www.oculusriftitalia.com/2015/05/26/gon-e-choo-e-il-figlio-virtuale-di-donkey-kong/). This game was just Greenlit a couple of days ago—is there a template I can add for that? (I already added the Category.) I'd like to have a bit more of a chance to add all of the content before the article is judged. Any more specific pointers to improve it will be appreciated! Jsaiya (talk) 23:38, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * The problem at the moment is establishing notability. That source, along with the one on the article aren't enough to satisfy WP:GNG. It would be more appropriate for you to improve the article in the Draft namespace in case this is an example of WP:TOOSOON.  Then it can be reviewed and submitted later. --The1337gamer (talk) 23:47, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * That Italian site looks like a blog, which doesn't count as a reliable source. We should only revisit this once the game is covered by vetted video game sources. – czar   00:04, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 5 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: If even by the horribly loose standards of VG/RS there aren't any qualifying sources, this is at *least* a TOOSOON. Fails the GNG.  Nha Trang  Allons! 11:25, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. – 323 MU (talk) 21:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.