Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gonzalo Galván Castillo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK with no prejudice against a properly done renomination. Mz7 (talk) 04:47, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Gonzalo Galván Castillo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lack of Information Tonim 007 (talk) 15:37, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Tonim 007 (talk) 15:37, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Roman Catholic bishops are considered to be notable. Thank You-RFD (talk) 15:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep nom did not WP:BEFORE, this appears to be a nonsense nom. Praxidicae (talk) 15:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  15:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  15:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep - no valid reason for deletion provided. I'm not an expert on the subject but there are a few sources coming up which might be enough to build a biography from    Spiderone  15:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is built on verifiability and independent, reliable, quality third partly sources giving indepth coverage, that is lacking here. The assumption that all Catholic bishops are notable is not being born out by the sourcing we actual see in the articles. This assumption has given us a lot of sub-stub articles with no substance.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Probably worth noting that the nominator has been submitting a large volume of spurious AfDs lately, and this article seems to have enough sources (plus the arguably inherent notability of the subject). jp×g 04:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.