Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good*Fella Media (GFM)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 03:33, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Good*Fella Media (GFM)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not my field, but I do not see any of these references as substantial and independent--except for a local newspaper, and local newspapers m are not selective in covering local personalities  DGG ( talk ) 22:10, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 4 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 22:34, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 11:24, 18 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete The ballyhooed Hudson Reporter article makes it clear this organisation was a small semi-pro internet radio/blogging operation with a passion for self-promotion. The article appears to have been created by someone interested in advertising the subject. I do not believe that WP:WEB "web content ... is only accepted as notable if it can be shown to have attracted notice." or WP:ORG "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 07:08, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Difficult to find anything more than a passing reference in secondary sources even with a variation in spelling; fails WP:ORG. Blackguard  08:37, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.