Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoodNotes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Complex / Rational 15:55, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

GoodNotes

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Routine coverage. Insufficient references to establish notability or pass WP:NSOFT. I have tried to expand a bit more with refs since I nominated just in case others disagree. Uhooep (talk) 11:28, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:00, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, sources available online appear to be mostly reviews, failing WP:GNG. NotAGenious (talk) 12:55, 9 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete, having made a single edit to this page (Make of that what you will), I'm of the opinion that it also probably wouldn't pass NSOFT. Most of the sources I've seen are either reviews or are copies/rewordings of press releases. If there are suitable sources which describe its impact on the software world then it would be worth keeping, but I haven't seen any yet. Apparently their addition of Machine-Learning tools is a 'world first' (says their press release) which may eventually confer notability, but that would be WP:CRYSTAL. If it does come into notability in the future the article could easily be rewritten, since it's pretty much still a stub with promotional history at this point. PenguinPhone (talk) 22:18, 10 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.