Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Deeds Day


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 05:25, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Good Deeds Day

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

non encyclopedic, clearly advertorial, participation by name sake user name. Graywalls (talk) 22:36, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 22:36, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:55, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep There is coverage and . Coverage of events in the Phillipines and in St Lucia, seems to be a global event. Oaktree b (talk) 00:14, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: No coverage in reliable sources. Seems to be a promotional piece. Maliner (talk) 13:29, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not meet GNG. It seems prootional --Wyndhan Han (talk) 11:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

*Weak Keep: news coverage seems to be global and work with GNG. Gerblinpete (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 08:56, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment did you see the depth and quality of coverage? I just removed some sources, such as a video from Good Deeds Day's own YouTube. Look through contribution history and you'll see a good chunk of info added into the article is a user name that is the same as the article title. Graywalls (talk) 14:12, 30 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. As others mentioned before me, coverage is more than sufficient for the WP:GNG. These are just a few of the articles. Not sure how this could have been nominated. gidonb (talk) 23:26, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Why are we not finding any English sources for supposedly globally notable thing? Graywalls (talk) 23:04, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * How does your question even START to relate to my opinion? My opinion is that this is a major community day in Israel and hence notable. There is sufficient SIGCOV to support this. I never spoke about anything international. Why would that even matter? The population of Israel is 10 million people. Is this some kind of deflection from my opinion and sources? If you have questions for other people, please ask elsewhere! gidonb (talk) 00:59, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * In addition to irrelevant, it also is untrue. Consider: . That's just SOME of the English-language coverage in just ONE fine English-language newspaper. Please check before asking and, more important, do a WP:BEFORE ahead of nominating an article! gidonb (talk) 01:22, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Relisting to review newly discovered sources. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:34, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 01:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep, abundant RS coverage demonstrated. We might quibble over whether this has been adequately shown to be a global phenomenon (although a scan of Google News suggests it is), but it has certainly been shown above to have ample GNG-compliant coverage within Israel. (In the "things on AFD that make you go hmm" department, I will note that the two delete votes claiming no RS coverage came after a comment providing two facially reliable sources, and did not state any grounds for considering them unreliable.) -- Visviva (talk) 00:37, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per multiple reliable sources provided above. Cavarrone 09:39, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Something doesn't have to be global to be notable - evidently big in Israel and with some coverage elsewhere. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.