Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Gifts Catalogue


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 19:00, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Good Gifts Catalogue

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An excellent cause for sure but my searches found no considerably good coverage with the best being here (fades by page 3), here (one page, the BBC News is probably the most outstanding from that) and here with browser, highbeam and Newspapers Archive finding nothing. Overall, it simply seems there's nothing to suggest even minimal improvement or moving elsewhere. Not to mention it must not be that commonly known (or at least as obviously known) as this hasn't been heavily edited since inception in October 2007 with maintenance edits here and there. Inviting past editors to comment. SwisterTwister  talk  06:29, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:50, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete, per nom basically. Don't even remember editing this one. SwisterTwister has made a reasonable effort to find sources, and makes a good case for non-notability. Robofish (talk) 21:52, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮  JAaron95  Talk   18:17, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * uncertain possibly merge somehow, possibly to an article on the parent organization, Charities Advisory Trust.  DGG ( talk ) 01:52, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as lacking indepedent sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:38, 19 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.