Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Samaritan School - Jasola


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Meets WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES Nakon  04:32, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Good Samaritan School - Jasola

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Private school, search for source returned little more than directories, indexes, review sites, school's own site and social networking accounts, and the occasional article, no evidence of significant coverage by anyone, fails WP:ORG.  JW  Noctis talk to me 07:33, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I myself noticed this earlier and wanted to speedy but since it's still a school, delete at best and restart if needed. SwisterTwister   talk  07:34, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:34, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:34, 7 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep: Registration Code 1925346 (with additional info indicated as sourced from 2013-14 government data here). Associated charity is at http://www.friendsofthegoodsamaritans.org (note copyvio or COI cut-and-pastes). As a I-XII school (not senior only -- the charity site indicates the building is secondary school and there are two feeder primary sites) it meets WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES (note also WP:INDAFD), therefore a weak keep for consistency until community agreement is reached that only schools proven (rather than assumed) to be notable should be kept. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 10:42, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:V and WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Constant stream of Indian schools at AfD is tiring. No one nominates American secondary schools for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 06:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * This isn't strictly true - see Articles for deletion/Randolph Southern Junior-Senior High School and Articles for deletion/Union City Community High School, for instance. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:13, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Good point, this and Hydronium Hydroxide's above. Would have withdrawn the nomination now, but if only I still could.  JW  Noctis talk to me 06:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - does not appear to be there subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, and therefore does not meet WP:GNG. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:08, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Passes WP:V. VMS Mosaic (talk) 00:33, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Promo. And WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES is of course no policy or proper argument to use here. It is just an in complete summery of earlier AfDs with no value or status at all. The Banner talk 09:04, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Policy is supposed to reflect practice, and practice is that articles about secondary/high schools are kept. If the written policy doesn't say that then the problem is that it doesn't reflect the actual policy, which is precisely based on a summary of earlier AfDs and has more value and status than anything that isn't based on what is actually done here. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 22:11, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * But Schooloutcomes is NOT a policy, not by far. And to keep a school because they are kept in the past, is a rather poor argument (especially as school are not always kept). The Banner talk 02:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment - This AfD suggests a better attentive consensus is needed and I'm asking who asks to be notified of education subjects, I also welcome his analysis hence.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:06, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are several ways of making guidelines. One of them is consistent practice. We make the rule by what we do here--they are not handed down to use00there is no legislative body or dictator or executive commitee making rules.  What we normally do is a guideline for what we do. 99.99% of articles on secondary schools in the last 6 years have been kept, unless there was some special case like a doubt about real existence--or of course other factors such as copyvio. (that number isn't a random guess--we've had in that period  about 50,000 such articles. fewer than 5 have been deleted --in a very few aberrant afds )  DGG ( talk ) 07:57, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * So you consider the summery Common Outcomes as a guideline? The Banner talk 08:11, 14 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep – per long-term consensus as documented at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and Notability (high schools); secondary school articles are typically retained. North America1000 19:33, 14 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.