Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Seven international beauty pageants


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:39, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Good Seven international beauty pageants

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't appear to be an established term, probably coined by the article's author. The supposed references do not use the term; Google search didn't return anything relevant. Proposed deletion removed by article's creator. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 08:37, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * delete no serious content. Looks part of the ongoing campaign to promote minor pageants. The Banner talk 11:58, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:49, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:49, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article is an original research, analysis, and synthesis for which no reliable published sources exist to support the "Good Seven international beauty pageants." It's an advertisement.--Richie Campbell (talk) 15:13, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Original research that lists together several minor pageants. No credible evidence that the term exists outside Wikipedia. The references don't support the article. Independent searches yielded a single blog that references the Wikipedia article. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:HOAX Legacypac (talk) 19:31, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:HOAX looks about right. Edwardx (talk) 21:03, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.