Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Thanks, You?


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Steve Smith (talk) 14:53, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Good Thanks, You?

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No significant independent coverage in reliable sources. It was nominated for awards at festivals, but did not win any, and I can't find any actual prose reviews of the film. signed,Rosguill talk 01:21, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 01:21, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 01:21, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Nominated for a bunch of obscure "local film festival" awards. No meaningful in-depth coverage. Even the plot summary is very vague: "In the aftermath of an attack, Amy is left voiceless, trapped in a whirlwind of incompetence. She must find a way to confront what has happened, in order to save what matters to her most." It mentions "an attack" and "what has happened" to save "what matters." Why not any actual details as to what those are? Scrooge200 (talk) 22:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - was one of the films of the "2020 Semaine de la Critique label" []. Also Cannes Critics’ Week reveals 2020 label selection as a short []. Kolma8 (talk) 17:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   10:40, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete from what I can tell this didn't win anything it was nominated for and I don't think there's anything else that would make it notable. Definitely the references in the article do not pass WP:GNG due to only being brief mentions or dead links. There wasn't anything else when I looked either. Let alone multiple in-depth reviews of it. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:14, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NFILM.  Onel 5969  TT me 23:46, 1 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was result. Steve Smith (talk) 14:53, 2 January 2021 (UTC)