Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good for the Gander (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to D. S. Bradford. Randykitty (talk) 15:58, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Good for the Gander (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable film, no significant independent coverage, per WP:NFF BOVINEBOY 2008 10:26, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 11:21, 2 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom. The poster made me laugh, the duck looks so sad... 💵Money💵emoji💵 Talk 11:48, 2 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Independent sources have been added. Please reconsider. talk —Preceding undated comment added 13:15, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to D. S. Bradford. This just doesn't have the needed coverage just yet to really justify inclusion on Wikipedia., the sources you added either aren't the type that would show notability or they're not enough on their own. IMDb isn't seen as a reliable source since it accepts user submitted content and doesn't have a very good verification system. Two of the sources pretty much report on the same thing: the release of a trailer. The Fox source is OK, but not really enough to firmly show notability. I think that this should redirect to Bradford's article until more coverage becomes available, upon which point it can be restored. ReaderofthePack (｡◕‿◕｡)  20:18, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The Fox report is a reprint of a press release, so it also does not meet secondary sourcing standards. BOVINEBOY 2008 22:00, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment if it gets at least two reviews in reliable sources, preferably more, once it is released it can be recreated and G4 would not apply, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 14:16, 7 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.