Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good of All


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:17, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Good of All

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:ORG. Per WP:BEFORE I tried to do some research on the org, and I assumed sources might have been easy to miss because of its somewhat generic name after finding nothing of note. After checking the eight sources in the article I am more confident in stating this org is simply non-notable. None qualify as independent, reliable, and significant coverage:
 * Source 1 is written by the founder.
 * Sources 2 and 3 are in Korean, but a Google translate look suggests the articles are both brief interviews with the founder, and they do not detail Good of All's work in any meaningful sense.
 * Source 4 is a release from Good of All by PR Newswire, and thus is WP:SELF and WP:PROMOTION
 * Source 5 is an op-ed by the founder
 * Source 6 is an almost identical op-ed, again by the founder
 * Source 7 is by the founder
 * Source 8 hints at funding some sort of scholarship, but the link is dead. I found the article here—it's from a Substack, and the total money disbursed was only $16,000. WhinyTheYounger (WtY) (talk, contribs)  18:07, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)  (talk, contribs)  18:07, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:41, 26 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. The generic name makes a search hard, but I looked in conjunction with the name of the founder and discovered no RIS. Mccapra (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.