Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good scientific practice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:23, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Good scientific practice
Essay in namespace, body of text is essentially a copy/paste, rest is just a strange personal essay.--172.162.149.247 17:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)


 * delete as per nom William M. Connolley 17:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Rohirok 18:18, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, some copyvio, some original research. All unencyclopedic. -- Kinu t /c  18:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete FeloniousMonk 20:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. This would maybe be an interesting topic for WikiBooks, but the content itself is not deserving of a TransWiki. --Thorne N. Melcher 22:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's a personal essay with bits of copyvio and OR. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 00:33, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above, with the clarification that I don't think it would be useful on Wikibooks either. KillerChihuahua?!? 14:05, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Ed, get a blog or something. &mdash; Dunc|&#9786; 20:52, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not enough actual content to warrant anything here. Redirect? HawkerTyphoon 09:05, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom--Toffile 17:11, 5 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.