Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goodbinder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:22, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Goodbinder

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability and lack of sources. Prodded a couple of weeks ago, but it's back. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:24, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence found to establish notability, either as the company or their CMS software. AllyD (talk) 18:01, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 1 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete for now - Start up article for a start up company that was apparently created only this year but I went ahead and searched Google News including the archives and found nothing. Additional searches conflicted with other companies or people with the name "Goodbinder" but nothing substantial (primary sources) for this Goodbinder. Lack of substantial news coverage if at all emphasizes how new this company is but the lack of even that many primary sources is more emphasis. The bottom line is that there isn't much to support this article. No prejudice towards a future article. SwisterTwister   talk  21:08, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.