Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goodfellows


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:41, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Goodfellows

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Too Early to create. Fails WP:ORG MickeyMouse143 (talk) 22:32, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Organizations,  and India. MickeyMouse143 (talk) 22:32, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:55, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - the two references provided indicate significant coverage in independent reliable sources, so on the face of it this article satisfies GNG, but per WP:SUSTAINED these look like "brief bursts of news coverage" relating to a new organisation. Per nom, it's too early to tell whether ongoing coverage will emerge to indicate sustained notability. Waggers<small  style="color:#080">TALK  14:48, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: The provided references are (1) a start-up interview about the company's aspirations, and (b) an investment announcement, neither of which meets WP:CORPDEPTH. Searches find just more of the same start-up coverage, which is insufficient to demonstrate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 13:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete the nominator is correct Bruxton (talk) 16:54, 5 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.