Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goodmusic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Goodmusic

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Notability in question. Article only contains a couple of external links to OUP and MPA, but no sources about the company. Searching for this company is difficult, as there are several other companies and sites with this name, but as far as I can see, there is no significant coverage to be found on Google Web or News search. Favonian (talk) 18:44, 11 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 04:09, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - CSD removed by IP, prob creator. Cannot find notability. Smappy (talk) 23:13, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Speedy Delete in accordance with WP:CSD. No claim to notability is asserted, nor are any reliable, third party sources cited to support such a claim. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 17:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - WP:A7. Unless simply being a company is a claim to notability, this should be speedied. Even if it doesn't meet A7, it won't pass WP:CORP, Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  20:28, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.