Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goodyear chimney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Very marginal, but the few sources confirm its notability (non-admin closure) Sir  Rcsprinter,  Bt (talkin' to me?)  @ 09:14, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Goodyear chimney

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTABILITY. That the demolition was reported in the local paper does not prove notability of the chimney. This is a contested PROD. For info: I think the only in-links are from the Goodyear template. DexDor (talk) 05:15, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm surprised by how few sources I've been able to find for what is correctly described as an iconic landmark, as anyone who spent a lot of time driving up and down the M6 motorway (one of England's main north-south routes) will know. This should be refactored as an article about the Wolverhampton Goodyear factory, about which plenty of sources are available: . Phil Bridger (talk) 07:37, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  08:30, 9 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge to new article on the Goodyear factory in Wolverhampton. I agree with Czar. BigJim707 (talk) 18:58, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mkdw talk 19:10, 19 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep, pending merging into an article about the entire factory, which was a major landmark, and for which there appear to be multiple sources. 122.176.146.47 (talk) 20:55, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Reporting by a newspaper indicates notability rather than the contrary. Warden (talk) 22:17, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.