Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gooey Louie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was The result was Delete by Nihonjoe. Diez2 16:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Gooey Louie

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This was originally prodded as 'Not for things made up in school one day', but I thought it only fair to remove that, as I know that it is not the case. I thought it fair that the article was brought here, as it had already been Prodded, and I was not sure of the notability. No vote from me, for now. J Milburn 22:58, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I think it really is WP:NFT which is slowly becoming WP:NEO, so get rid of it, no notability asserted, no verifiability provided. The Rambling Man 23:05, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - the article is too short, no notability and so onBartekos 23:13, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. It is not something made up in school one day. It is an actual retail product . --- RockMFR 23:26, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment on comment - definitely agree, you can buy it on Amazon etc, but it's a school-ism that's become an neolgism and outside of the crap toys, does it assert WP:N? If so, I'll happily become a keeper.  The Rambling Man 23:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Yes, it definately exists- see this. I think it could probably scrape notability, but I am not going to pull my hair out trying to prove it. J Milburn 23:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. Where the hell do people come up with an idea for a game like this. Aplomado  talk 23:35, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep: It is a game product from Pressman toy company.  Here's a review. The article when subbed for afd was woefully shy of context though leading to submission.  ju66l3r 23:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Just because the toy/game exists doesn't mean it's notable. Aplomado  talk 23:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment (albeit late) deleted already... The Rambling Man 23:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Response: Just because a toy/game exists and has multiple independent reviews means it is.    Google for "Gooey Louie".  Why was this article deleted mid-afd?  ju66l3r 00:00, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, it seems to be gone now for some reason, but it's definitely a real retail product by a major board game company. Krimpet 02:01, 1 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.