Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goof (Thomas & Friends)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:30, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Goof (Thomas & Friends)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As much as I liked Thomas and Friends when I was a kid, goofs/outtakes are probably best suited for Wikia or IMDb as opposed to Wikipedia. This is just way too fancrufty to be encyclopedic. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:08, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Delete - Agreed. London Hall (talk) 15:27, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ... whereas a goof on another show is completely different. I don't think so: delete. Mangoe (talk) 16:18, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:FANCRUFT. Not encyclopedia whatsoever. Ajf773 (talk) 17:34, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Ajf773. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 18:34, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable and fancrufty. SportingFlyer (talk) 19:14, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fancruft. Szzuk (talk) 22:55, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-encyclopediac WP:FAN. Loopy30 (talk) 12:40, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. This has no notability and half looks like it may be trying to promote someone's Youtube videos. Dunarc (talk) 23:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.