Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goof night


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. WP:SNOW Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 20:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Goof night

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Utterly non-notable neologism in its defined form. Yes, there's an entry on Urban Dictionary for it as a Saturday night in general; however, Urban Dictionary is not a reliable source. No notability, no verifiability. —C.Fred (talk) 00:12, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as non-notable, possibly WP:MADEUP neologism with no reliable references. ALI nom nom 00:21, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism of questionable (i.e. zero) notability. ... disco spinster   talk  00:31, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete CSD A7.--Savonneux (talk) 00:40, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Frankly, with some of the edits being made to the article, it could almost qualify under G10. —C.Fred (talk) 00:45, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Two verifiable sources are added. It is a fact that the term exist. Wether you believe it or not, or find it insignificant at this stage does not change the fact. IT does exist. Now if wiki to stay progressive I think the article should stay. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Libertcat (talk • contribs) 00:54, 10 May 2010 (UTC) — Libercat (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Speedy delete Neologism made up by someone.WP:CSD: A7, G10. Edison (talk) 01:03, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I thought saturday was stirfry night.--Savonneux (talk) 01:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete To the author, before we get into any WP:BLP issues, don't use Wikipedia to mention your friends and acquaintances by name. Pathetic.  Mandsford (talk) 02:19, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:NOTDICTIONARY and lack of other notable substance. --  Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 02:50, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * SNOW delete, non-notable neolgism. I would love to speedy this one, but there is no such speedy criterion, as I often lament. There are several votes for A7, but A7 doesn't come close to applying. Hairhorn (talk) 03:05, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, made up at school one day. I cannot really see any reliable sources, and Urban Dictionary isn't a reliable source. The mention of Paris Hilton seems rather far-fetched. J I P  | Talk 06:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, quickly, whether by Speedy or SNOW or IAR. This is obviously just an attempt by some kid to get their name on Wikipedia, if only for a day or two.  Let's not reward such misbehaviour by giving it any further attention. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:43, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.