Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google Chrome


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy keep per WP:SNOW. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 02:16, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Google Chrome

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article has no WP:RS and won't have any, most of the sources are WP:SPS by Google which violates WP Policy. Remember WP:NOT and WP:NOTADVERTISING. The article does not establish WP:NOTE and contains WP:OR Patcat88 (talk) 01:56, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I vote to keep it. Wikipedia has articles on Firefox, Internet Explorer, and lesser know programs. Keep. 72.220.173.236 (talk) 02:03, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * keep. Duh, people are looking for information on this --Perwfl (talk) 02:06, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * KEEP http://news.google.com/news?q=google+chrome+browser gives a lot of reliable sources. WashPost, SanFran Chronicle, AP, etc. --Rajah (talk) 02:07, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * KEEP as there is not much info out there about it and the first place people look is wikipedia. it also seems that any new info on wikipedia is delited as soon as it is saved (that,s just not fair) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pivorod (talk • contribs) 02:09, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep, Uhh, aren't major Google products inherently notable now? ViperSnake151 02:11, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep When Nightly Business Report covers a new browser, I think there's probably enough notability. Maxamegalon2000 02:13, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * KEEP as I have seen forum posts pointing to this entry when people asked for details. And there are lots of independent reviews (Walt Mossberg for example)


 * Keep. There was a WSJ article on Chrome.  Close this silly page.  exeunt (talk) 02:15, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.