Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google Earth Icons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:13, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Google Earth Icons
A gallery (which I object to on general principles) of icons made by students at Carleton University. Not an encyclopedia article. User:Zoe|(talk) 03:46, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete --Ajdz 03:51, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom Tom Harrison (talk) 03:51, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

The original editor moved the article to Custom Icons and stripped off the AfD header. I have reverted his deletion of the header and have suggested that is not appropriate. User:Zoe|(talk) 04:40, 21 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete Can't this one be speedy deleted? It's clearly not encyclopediac (sp.?) in any way. --kingboyk 05:07, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Article creators who strip an AfD nomination deserve a few extra delete comments. Durova 08:21, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not, um, a repository for images, I guess. --Zetawoof 09:17, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, I'd vote to merge to Google Earth, but these images are clearly mistagged as "a logo of a corporation, sports team, or other organization", and I can't think of anything that would allow fair use to kick in. - Mgm|(talk) 10:09, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Sceptre  ( Talk  ) 22:41, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vacuous listcruft with pictures Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 23:18, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Pavel Vozenilek 03:14, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. --Srleffler 04:06, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, although I disagree with Zoe on the usefullnes of Galleries (see Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not, and comment as you see fit), this is so clearly too trivial. Dsmdgold 16:31, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.