Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. &oelig; &trade; 16:50, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Goop

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This page provides no real information and is useless Seasider91 (talk) 14:41, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. Seasider91, please read WP:DISAMBIG. Island Monkey talk the talk 14:51, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - do we have enough topics to justify a disambiguation page? No, only two that I can see - so surely hatnotes will suffice? GiantSnowman 14:54, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.  — Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:23, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. Per WP:SK, a speedy keep is appropriate when the nominator advances no argument for deletion. I see none here. There is no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, thus WP:DPAGES is appropriate. I don't think WP:HAT is the best fit here because while we could link between the two articles, the whole thing would have to be redone if a third article that needs WP:D is added. Sailing to Byzantium (talk) 16:51, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per Sailing to Byzantium, who incidentally has a great username. -Phoenixrod (talk) 21:27, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.