Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goran Vuković


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The nom's concerns appear to have been addressed, and the other "delete" opinion is not compliant with policy when it argues that notability or sources outside Serbia are required.  Sandstein  10:21, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Goran Vuković

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete article for now, can be returned to its creator's mainspace for the massive improvements it needs. Utterly unsourced with a few one sentence paragraphs containing unsubstantiated allegations. I did a google search -- a few links came up in Serbian or Croatian or whatever but it is not my responsibility to translate them. Valid non English-language links are acceptable, of course, but it is the article's creators' and/or editors' responsibility to reflink and translate as appropriate. Quis separabit? 22:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  02:07, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  02:07, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. By nature, most references are going to be in Serbian. I cleaned up the article and added a reference from Vreme corroborating several statements in the article. I concede that it isn't perfect, but frankly I'm not too interested to dig further. No such user (talk) 16:08, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Perhaps it belongs in the Serbian Wikipedia, in all events, I can't source it and I don't see how we can have an article unless someone can source it show notability beyond Serbia, which could be done by using sources in other languages, or by demonstrating that he received extraordinary, sustained, in-depth national news coverage in Serbia, or that he had a significant impact of some sort on Serbia.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC) Updated comment in response to No such user.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:21, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Someone obviously can (I just did). If they will is another matter. However, "I can't source it" is not a reason for deletion. No such user (talk) 08:43, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * So I just demonstrated that he received "extraordinary, sustained, in-depth national news coverage in Serbia" by four different news source throughout the 2000s. No such user (talk) 14:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Notability beyond Serbia, or by means of sources in other languages than Serbian, is not required. This is an encyclopedia written in English that covers the whole universe, not just English-speaking countries. And we don't demand an "extraordinary" level of coverage, or that a subject has had a significant impact on its native country, for subjects whose only sources are in English, so the same applies to Serbia, as you should know from this essay linked from your user page. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 21:58, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - sources are provided. they do not need to be in english to be notable. anyway this one passes WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 10:29, 13 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep I have to use google translate on the sources, but I think there's enough material here that the subject meets GNG. Vanamonde93 (talk) 03:25, 17 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.