Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gordon Ritchie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Reverted to notable version prior to change of material. The politician seems notable. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:30, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Gordon Ritchie

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notability Deconstructhis (talk) 19:49, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete – Mr. Ritchie sounds like an extremely nice well respected individual. However, that does not translate into Notability as it is defined here at Wikipedia.  No information on Google News – No references at all in the article and no real claim to notability.  ShoesssS Talk
 * Revert back to the notable Canadian politician See this version of the article.  I think this is a case of vandalism that slipped through the cracks.  -- JamesTeterenko (talk) 20:06, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

oooops sorry about that. mea culpa Deconstructhis (talk) 20:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Great Catch James.    ShoesssS Talk 20:19, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It's blind luck really. It's been a while since I have looked at my watchlist.  When I looked at it today, there was an article I have edited up for deletion.  So, I had to take a look.  When I looked at the article, I couldn't believe that I would have ever touched an article like that without nominating it for deletion.  So, I checked the history to see what I was thinking.  Well, it was a very different article.  -- JamesTeterenko (talk) 20:38, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * It WAS a great catch. I've been trying to clean up some of the mess I've inadvertently created. Apologies to all Deconstructhis (talk) 20:41, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.