Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gordonism

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Xezbeth 20:02, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Gordonism
Someone's made up religion. Not notable, haven't seen any verifiable sources on it. Delete. Mgm|(talk) 18:15, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)

Comment - I'd vote for it to stay, but the presence of a personal email account address on the page leads me to believe that it's just for the purposes of proselytisation. Needs verification and a POV re-do. 216.158.31.195 18:19, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Unverifiable. Writings consist of "a book not published anywhere". The article notes that there are few adherents and, "[t]he church was officially founded in 1990, but since then, has barely left outside the family." Not notable. --Tabor 19:46, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC) (amend comments to include "original research" as another reason.) --Tabor 19:49, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I could find no Gordon Aarness on Google.  Even if this is true, the personally held beliefs of a few people do not just an entry in an encylcopedia.  19:50, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable and unverifiable, ergo opens the door for Tomism, Dickism, and Harryism. -- BD2412 talk 20:22, 2005 Jun 3 (UTC)
 * Delete unverifiable. JamesBurns 05:08, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .