Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gore: Ultimate Soldier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 10:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Gore: Ultimate Soldier

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

An extensive article with not one relliable independent source cited, the publisher is redlinked, most of it is a game guide (WP:NOT). Guy (Help!) 20:53, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 23:49, 6 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep – 36 reviews on Game Rankings, 22 reviews on Metacritic. Even accounting for overlap, that's more than enough to create a solid reception section. Articles provided by GameSpot and IGN show enough evidence to create a development section. The subject easily meets notability requirements. Just because the article is currently underdeveloped is not a reason to bring it to AfD, consider its potential, not its current state. I'd hardly consider the article "extensive", its barely off stub levels, and the one reference it does have in the article is a reliable source. -- Sabre (talk) 00:44, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Sabre. SharkD (talk) 04:56, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep & tag for wikification. Per above. WP:V and WP:RS are sufficiently verified.MLauba (talk) 14:09, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup — notability easily established. However, cleanup is definitely needed to improve the tone and remove the cruft/gameguide material. Deletion not necessary here. MuZemike 21:13, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete &mdash; questionable WP:RS indeed, but there's a possibility it could be improved Aurush kazeminitalk 06:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.