Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gorgani dialect


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Mazanderani language. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 19:21, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Gorgani dialect

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a moribund dialect with no ISO code. I think the content of this article should be transcluded into the Mazanderani page - I would be exceedingly happy to copy-edit this page and integrate it onto that one. Thank you. Navistheman (talk) 16:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 12.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 18:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to Mazanderani per nomination. The articles' statement of 'it appears to be extinct' leads me to believe that there is little information about it, and there will be little information about it for the forseeable future. If there is an appropriate place to put it in the Mazeanderani article, then I'm sure it would fit better as a section there than as a stub on it's own. Tpdwkouaa (talk) 19:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge: I would be in favor of letting Navistheman having a go at reorganizing the information on this topic in a better way for Wikipedia. By the way, the page history seems interesting, with a number of large increases and decreases in article length. OtterAM (talk) 19:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. I've just merged the pertinent content. Kind of new to Wikipedia so not really sure what happens now, or how to expedite the deletion process for Gorgani stub. And yeah, a lot of the previous content on the article was superfluous and irrelevant, pertaining to the etymology of the regional toponym 'Gorgan' which was already covered in the corresponding article. Bless you for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Navistheman (talk • contribs) 21:15, 12 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.