Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gorilla Groupie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 20:03, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Gorilla Groupie
There isn't any mention of notability or verifability in this article. WP:V WP:N Beno1000 16:07, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. I googled it, and didn't come up with anything noteworthy. Celardore 16:06, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as a hoax. Aplomado  talk 16:36, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.-- blue 520  09:57, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

I googled it and found several matches for "gorilla groupies". I'm not a "hoax". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gorillagroupie (talk • contribs)


 * Comment NONE of them are notable, and the phrase seems to be a neologism. But whatever it is, it's NOT NOTABLE. Beno1000 18:39, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment, yes, I believe you are a hoax. &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 23:34, 15 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. skorpion 01:31, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Is this a popularity contest or a serious research tool? If the term can be found in primary sources, then it should stay.
 * Comment Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. WP:NOT Which means that articles such as this, which are either neologisms or are just plainly not notable, should not be on Wikipedia. Beno1000 18:41, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.