Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gorillathrill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete criterion G11: Blatant advertising and self promotion, conflict of interest in writing the article -- Alasdair  06:07, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Gorillathrill

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I could claim my pet calico cat is as internationally recognized as this, and provide exactly as much substantiation of such. Vianello (talk) 01:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.   — Cliff smith  talk  01:24, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: creator has a COI, as evident from the article's history. Cliff smith  talk  01:20, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Such has been noted in the article's article issues template. Thank you for noting this. - Vianello (talk) 01:21, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete not as notable as the creator believes it is, as evidenced by his need to randomly boldface stuff in this article. JuJube (talk) 02:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Fails G11. Blatant advertising made by creator of the show, as indicated on talk page. Paragon  12321  02:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ADVERT. Cliff smith  talk  02:49, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ADVERT, possible G11, definitely not-notable.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 03:56, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as to WP:ADVERT as noted above and due to notability concerns; it's hard to verify outside notability of things, but in this case, the advertising of self evident tips it over the line. Ravenmasterq (talk) 04:36, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Notice. I've gone ahead and nominated this page for speedy deletion under g11 and other issues. - Vianello (talk) 05:46, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.