Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gort cloud


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 22:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Gort cloud

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Likely neologism largely sourced to one author's work. Declined speedy and sent here for the community's consideration Jclemens (talk) 02:02, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:32, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as neologism that is apparently used only by the author who coined it. The term isn't notable but the book presenting the coinage has been widely reviewed.  Therefore, much of the information in this article should be moved to a new article, The Gort Cloud, which would begin:
 * "The Gort Cloud is a 2008 book by Richard Seireeni. According to the author, the book describes 'a vast, largely invisible and growing (environmentally-aware) 'community' that sieves, measures and exchanges information on green products and services....'"
 * JamesMLane t c 04:36, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Why are you voting to delete this entry when you have found an obvious way to salvage it? - Mgm|(talk) 18:33, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * If that question is addressed to me, my answer is that I agree with salvaging the content, but my understanding is that the issue under discussion here is whether Wikipedia should have an article at this title. I think it shouldn't (at least not yet -- don't salt the title because the term might become prominent enough to merit an article.) JamesMLane t c 06:18, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Neutral Explicitly altering my nom to neutral; the article has substantially changed from the version I nominated. Jclemens (talk) 06:11, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. There's a good article here. An article about the book would cover similar territory as one about the concept. -- Banj e b oi   14:37, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep but possibly move to The Gort Cloud as suggested. Bearian&#39;sBooties (talk) 21:20, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.