Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gortavoy Bridge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus to delete. W.marsh 02:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Gortavoy Bridge

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Proceedual nomination for an IP user (talk) who is physically unable to complete this stage of the nomination. A comment was placed by this user in the above (on the daysheet) discussion; the diff can be viewed here. They state that the subject is "non-notable". Proceedual nomination - no stance -- saberwyn 12:06, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep as ghits indicate it is a real place, with some inhabitants, generally considered notable. (The article should clarify it is a place named for a bridge, and not an article on the bridge itself.) --Dhartung | Talk 08:50, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per Dhartung. Is this a town or what?  Also, what are the criteria for keeping something like this?  If its only a bridge, maybe merge it to the appropriate town or county?  &mdash; Gaff  ταλκ 15:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge/Redirect with Shanmaghery. Every single place, word, person or blade of grass does not need an article on Wiki. That it exists is fair enough, but the article itself reveals how uninteresting the place actually is. Even Shanmaghery itself lacks interest, and Gortavoy Bridge is simply a footnote to a place that is simply "an isolated area spanning one small road and several country lanes that straddle hilly countryside". Sigh! SilkTork 18:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.