Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gospel for Asia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Gospel for Asia

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not a notable religious organization. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 20:38, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Ism schism (talk) 20:41, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —Ism schism (talk) 20:41, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. 202.124.73.141 (talk) 23:10, 30 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep This organisation is indeed notable in Christendom. I hope this helps. With regards, AnupamTalk 23:13, 30 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep The GFA has received substantial coverage in books and newspapers, including a degree of controversy. The nominator is reminded of WP:BEFORE. -- 202.124.73.141 (talk) 23:16, 30 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. Several reliable sources have been added to the article. Given the extremely high level of controversy about the GFA in India, I find the nomination incomprehensible. -- 202.124.72.101 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:07, 31 January 2012 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:11, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Seems wp:notable. North8000 (talk) 13:18, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Since the nomination, the lack-of-sourcing issue that was the entire reason to delete has been fixed. –Ugncreative Usergname (talk) 15:14, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.