Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gossamer Commons

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Essjay ·  Talk 08:48, August 11, 2005 (UTC)

Gossamer Commons
nn four-month-old webcomic. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 04:59, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete has an Alexa rank of 810,525. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 11:01, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable. --Merovingian (t) (c) 11:55, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable--BirgitteSB 18:40, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge with Eric Burns. --Carnildo 23:18, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - I find it amusing that, at 78 comics, it doesn't even pass the author's own proposal for inclusion (which VfD very consistently ignores), which basically kicked off the Webcomic Wikiproject. Nifboy 08:51, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Eric Burns- Alexa rank of 709,074, an increase of over 100,000 since mentioned above four days ago. Gossamer Commons recieved an |Honorable Mention for Outstanding Newcomer (one of two Honorable Mentions) in the 2005 Web Cartoonists’ Choice Awards. I'd like to keep it, but apparently it doesn't match up with the guidelines for Wikipedia inclusion (which I don't particularly agree with, but those are the rules), so I say merge. I am the creator of the page, fwiw. Quentin mcalmott 00:33, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge with Eric Burns, as ironic as it is for me to vote this way. At this stage, Gossamer Commons is well under a year old and doesn't have sufficient depth of archive to justify inclusion at this time. The honorable mention does bespeak a certain significance to the webcomics community, but it can be argued said significance better fits within the general "Eric Burns" entry. --Eric Burns 06:09, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page..