Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GotUrethane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If anyone wants it userfying let me know. Davewild (talk) 06:50, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

GotUrethane

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional, no reliable, independent sources and none found on Google, no indication that this company meets the notability guideline. Contested PROD, reason for removing was "deletion tag removed. i searched google and found sources mentioning this organization". The user who removed the tag has not produced any such sources. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 23:26, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  01:09, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  01:09, 9 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP as there are no reliable sources at all that discuss the company. Inks.LWC (talk) 04:22, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC (talk) 04:25, 9 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete and draft/userfy - This could be a better article but my searches (News, Books, browser, highbeam, thefreelibrary) found nothing good with the best result being this ("California Manufacturers Register"). SwisterTwister   talk  21:48, 11 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.