Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gotem (slang)

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted at 02:03, 5 July 2005 by user:Jimfbleak who commented "drivel". Re-created and again speedy-deleted at 23:17, 5 July 2005 by user:Gwalla who commented "Re-creation of content already discussed and deleted twice, first at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Gotem(speech) and then again at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Caughtem)". Closing the discussion.  Rossami (talk) 22:33, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

Gotem (slang)
Neologism. Denni &#9775; 2005 July 5 18:09 (UTC)
 * Delete Neologism. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. -- BMIComp  (talk) 5 July 2005 18:13 (UTC)
 * No Neologisms are not neccessarily to be deleted. Pwned falls under that category but seems to have a place in Wikipedia. 63.21.130.18 5 July 2005 18:34 (UTC)
 * That's what I was about to write: Write an article as in-depth as Pwn and I'll vote for strong keep. But if we keep deleting the first revision, then the article never has the chance to become as excellent as the Pwn article is, so I guess that's not fair. In this case, I'm not sure whether the term is notable enough, I'll abstain for now. --Moritz 5 July 2005 20:35 (UTC)
 * That's because Pwn is such an unbelievably popular neolo. This is not. When a VfD says Neolo, NN is implied. --Alex12 3 6 July 2005 01:03 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable neologism, WP:WINAD, per deletion policy. Dunc|&#9786; 5 July 2005 18:46 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. Jaxl 5 July 2005 19:01 (UTC)
 * Delete as a dic def (regardless of it being slang or not). Also, I remember a similar article being deleted earlier this year. - Mgm|(talk) July 5, 2005 19:24 (UTC)
 * Delete: NN Neolo. --Alex12 3 6 July 2005 01:03 (UTC)
 * Delete neologism. JamesBurns 6 July 2005 01:44 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as simple re-creation of content already discussed and deleted twice, first at Votes for deletion/Gotem(speech) and then again at Votes for deletion/Caughtem. Uncle G 6 July 2005 02:34 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.