Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gothic War (Warhammer 40,000)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Gothic War (Warhammer 40,000)
Pure plot summary describing the background of the Warhammer 40K miniatures game. This plot summary doesn't actually go with any work; it's a synthesis of various comments about such-and-such war in different works. This fails Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information #7 and WP:NOR. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 11:50, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Pak21 11:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete possibly merge to main article if the information is relevant and sourced. --Porqin 12:02, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I fail to see what makes this article any different from other articles we have regarding fictious backstory. --Falcorian (talk) 12:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment perhaps those other articles should be deleted as well :-) Could you give some pointers as to some similar articles you're referring to? Cheers --Pak21 13:02, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Reply Armageddon (Warhammer 40,000), Horus Heresy, Age of Strife, and Great Crusade. --Falcorian (talk) 03:25, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:V and I'm pretty suspicious it violates WP:OR - if citations are added, I'll reconsider WilyD 14:15, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * As the creator of the article I actually agree with deletion; given that I've rewritten it as a section in another article. I accept I was coming at this one from the wrong angle - but I'd like people to note that it is not original research. The only reason I haven't (correctly) referenced the Battlefleet Gothic book is that at the time I hadn't figured out the referencing syntax.Sojourner001 14:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, well if you can patch it up to get it past WP:V, it'll probly be able to get past WP:OR - the latter is more like how it tastes than anything concrete. WilyD 15:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * It can easily be patched for WP:V. --Falcorian (talk) 03:25, 12 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.