Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gotuit/


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Deville (Talk) 15:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Gotuit/
non-notable company, prod was removed by the only contributor. --DrTorstenHenning 07:51, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, advertising. It has products in media space. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:01, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article does not look overtly advertisement like. The company appears to meet critera 1 of WP:CORP.  A cursory search and read through news.google.com for them seems to indicate quite a few press articles.  It does look like the article title is a type though with the / at the end. -- Whpq 19:14, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Mallanox 22:16, 21 August 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Petros471 21:19, 27 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. It should be Gotuit, not Gotuit/. Anyway, the company has had its fair share of press releases, so it's definitely a keeper (passes WP:CORP --  Nishkid64  Talk Contribs   21:35, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I fixed it. PT  ( s-s-s-s ) 23:57, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Er, no you didn't. You copy-paste moved it, and I had to copy-paste move it back. Right now, I abstain from this deletion discussion. Ryūlóng 23:59, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, yes, I did fix it. It should be at Gotuit. PT  ( s-s-s-s ) 18:25, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Ryūlóng's point was that when you do a makeshift page move by copying and pasting text rather than using the move function, you break apart the logs and histories. When a redirect prevents the page move function, an admin needs to take care of it. Fireplace 18:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I see. Thank you for your more civil explanation! PT  ( s-s-s-s ) 19:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * You repeated your copy and paste move. That is not how pages should be moved- you should use the 'move' tab at the top of the page, as I have just done now. Petros471 19:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * No one had bothered to explain that. PT  ( s-s-s-s ) 19:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Press releases and media reprints of press releases specifically do not satisfy WP:CORP. Fireplace 03:34, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Looking at the authorship and the style of article, it was clearly created by a person with commercial interest. It seems to be an upmarket version of youtube or myspace. One patent does not a notable corp make. It has 40 employees. Ohconfucius 04:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.