Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goudy Pro Font


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete (WP:CSD, WP:CSD). King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 18:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Goudy Pro Font

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I'm not so sure if I'm wrong here, but this comes up as not notable in my eyes. It's very minimally source (fails WP:RS), and lacks an intro (fails WP:LEAD).  Dylan 620  Wishes you a Happy Easter! 10:41, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Keep in mind that lacking a Lead and not having too many Reliable Sources is not a reason for deletion. Cheers.  I 'mperator 14:37, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment-Well, it needs to be written over again neutrally at least.  Ir ' di ' ce  nt  23 15:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It has a lead, it's just below the TOC instead of above it. Easily fixed.  That's not to say these fonts are necessarily notable, though.  Powers T 15:29, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfy per comments above. Appears like there was no attempt to WP:PRESERVE or WP:BEFORE before this deletion. Let the creator spend some time working on the article in userspace. Ikip (talk) 16:13, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * If the fonts are not notable, no amount of work will rescue the article. Powers T 16:47, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is borderline speedy deletable as spam to promote Ascender by an editor with clear COI issues. --DAJF (talk) 12:22, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as spam and a copyright violation of Ascender Corp. It's a reprint of this press release. Wronkiew (talk) 16:26, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.