Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goverlan VNC Viewer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 08:34, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Goverlan VNC Viewer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This has been recreated after a PROD once, so we should have a definitive discussion. This article is sourced only to the company's own website. I've looked in the usual places and I cannot find any in-depth coverage of this company that isn't a press release or similar. I think this fails the general notability criteria and should be deleted. MrOllie (talk) 16:20, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:41, 6 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - ad created by an editor with obvious COI. No indication of notability. See also WP:Articles for deletion/Goverlan Remote Control Software and WP:Articles for deletion/PJ Technologies for closely related AfD discussions. Another related article by this user, WMIX Software, is currently PROD'ed. Lemnaminor (talk) 09:18, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * This is actually the third time this page has been created. Speedied as copyvio in 2012 and PROD'ed in 2014. --Lemnaminor (talk) 11:38, 11 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 20:22, 14 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Unquestionable delete, in particular since the other Goverlan WP articles have been removed for the same reasons. LaMona (talk) 02:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.