Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government Engineering College, Bhuj


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 01:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Government Engineering College, Bhuj

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't find any evidence of notability. Adam9007 (talk) 21:13, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep as their website here shows it's a degree-awarding school thus certainly notable. SwisterTwister   talk  22:28, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep it is affiliated to Gujarat Technological University and is a degree awarding college per this and per thisPharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:22, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Reluctant delete per ORG. (I say "reluctant" because I spent half an hour cleaning up this article before deciding how to vote. Ha ha.) At this point, all the information in the article is appropriately cited either to reliable sources or to permissible self-published sources, and there is some coverage, but it's not significant, so, per the notability guidelines and FAILN, the subject doesn't get its own article. (ORG, by the way, reaffirms what should be obvious: schools, like other organizations, must meet the notability guidelines' modest requirement for significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the source and each other.) Rebb  ing  01:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as a degree-awarding institution per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:38, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per the addition of cite books that verify the institution exist, cf. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES that says: "Most independently accredited degree-awarding institutions and high schools are usually kept except when zero independent sources can be found to prove that the institution actually exists." Sam Sailor Talk! 13:39, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per long standing consensus on educational institutions of this type. Clearly passes WP:V. VMS Mosaic (talk) 01:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep obviously, as a degree awarding university. Anyone suggesting otherwise is adamantly applying ORG without a degree of the flexibiity our policies allow us to excercise.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:45, 4 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.