Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government efficiency


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:23, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Government efficiency

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

In the article's current state, it probably needs some WP:TNT. This list has apparently only had one entry since at least 2011, and the title of the article doesn't match the current content of the article: A sole, statistical entry for the United States. Steel1943 (talk) 21:44, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Government waste as a reasonable target, but that article probably could use some WP:TNT too... – Train2104 (t • c) 00:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. An article could certainly be created, but this sorry stub isn't it. Also, no such animal has ever been observed in the wild. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. While an article could, in theory, be created, this isn't it. Right now, it's a tiny stub of a fork of Government waste, to which it could be redirected in the good judgment of the closing sysop. Bearian (talk) 17:25, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:39, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:39, 12 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.