Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government perception affected by mass media


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:37, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Government perception affected by mass media

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Page has a history of vandalism and seems to exist only for the purpose of trolling. Trich25 (talk) 19:46, 22 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment I've seen far worse histories of vandalism, and that is not of itself a good reason for deletion. I'm not 100% certain about the value or point of the article, but I've seen it before without rushing to get it deleted. The fact that it's been here for over four years also isn't of itself a reason to keep, and nor is the presence of similar articles in French and Portuguese (closely linked to each other) and German. (I've not checked then thoroughly for similarity, but I've removed the Albanian link which went to an article about the geography of the Central African Republic.) Peridon (talk) 21:05, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:53, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Appears to be a made-up topic that is poorly sourced and poorly written. &mdash; Timneu22 · talk 15:56, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is an essay written from a particular point of view, not an encyclopedia article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:06, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep it for another year. If you (DumbBOT) arent 100% certain about the value or the point of the article then you cant be sure it should be deleted. --Zarutian (talk) 19:24, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Err, it's Peridon that Commented he wasn't 100% sure, and DumbBOT that completed the AfD nomination by listing it properly. I didn't !vote, and DumbBOT (being a BOT) can't anyway. Peridon (talk) 21:44, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete  as synthesis. The unambiguous way to cover the proposition if it is a real topic is to wait until a book on it becomes really notable, and write an article on the book.  DGG ( talk ) 05:08, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I see no reason to believe that this article can ever advance beyond a case of WP:SYNTH. Spiesr (talk) 22:21, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Essay - besides being a title that is most unlikely to ever be used as a search term. --MelanieN (talk) 01:04, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.