Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gozoop.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 08:54, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Gozoop.com

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Highly promotional. Nothing significant but another startup company. For being in Wikipedia need to be much more significant than this. Else Wikipedia will become a Startup directory. 1000s of startups happens every day. Just another one. Notability required repeated significant coverage by media as well as significance in itself. Definitely getting funded by VC, and building Wikiepdia page for their publicity, releasing articles on major media as paid. Covered once in a while. or covered mostly by Startup blogs not the notable media. startup does not mean they are Encyclopedia notable. seems like the article is written by close associate or company itself. Light2021 (talk) 15:26, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Jim Car ter  16:01, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:09, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:09, 1 October 2016 (UTC)




 * Comment – This company was founded in 2010, so in my opinion it's not particularly a startup company. North America1000 01:12, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete – Sources in the article provide rather routine coverage, and several searches have not provided coverage to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH at this time. North America1000 08:48, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: don't see anything substantial other than PR for this company. Fails WP:NCORP. Anup   [Talk]  04:55, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment – Hi Light2021, North America and Anup, Greetings, I’m Premkumar and I have been working with Gozoop for the past 6 years. I currently lead their Global Operations.Our objective to be on Wiki is not to garner publicity or VC attention, it is to give out information. Having said that, we have been facing some difficulty getting our content approved via moderation. The reason why it appears that our coverage is once in a while is because we don’t engage in active PR. The only time we did was when we acquired one of our competitors and a big name in the Indian Digital Industry, "Red Digital" (Please look this up). The other time was when we made it to the Great Places to Work in India list (we happen to be the only Advertising / Digital agency to feature on the list), alongside other giants like Google and American Express. Over the last 6 years we have set up offices in Dubai, Singapore, USA (NY) and 4 Indian Cities, acquired two firms (Red Digital and Ithink Infotech) and grown from a 10 member team to 175+ around the world. We are also the first agency in India to introduce the F-Commerce concept. ‘’’We have achieved all this without any external funding from anyone.’’’ Respected moderators, I firmly believe that while the Internet is open for all but it should be regulated to avoid misuse. However, I request you to relook this matter and not generalise us with spammers. We have been covered organically by all major publications in India and would be happy to share all the information needed to help an informed decision. Once again, I would like to mention that we are not a .com company; we are a full-fledged digital media agency and out to do serious work with humility. Please don’t delete the page Premkumariyer (talk) 07:41, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The company member is requesting this page to keep just becauase of their profile. Nothing notable about this company. thousands of digital agrency in the world. All the convincing matter merely nothing but a request to keep. Not convincing for its notability. Speedy delete after such request from the company itself. Proof of creation of this page merely for promotions. Light2021 (talk) 08:44, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment – Hi Light2021, Being Notable is a subjective term. How are you even judging, I made a Humble request and you are taking that in a very wrong sense. Wiki is open for all, there is not restrictions that a brand of x magnitude can only be part of it. I very explicitly wrote that being on Wiki is for Information sharing and nothing else. As a company dont we have a right to reason out? There are thousands of agencies in the world i agree, but then there is no Who Should be on WIKI policy as well. My request was very humble and positive, but your comment makes me feel you are not ready for a dialogue. Sorry i dont see a reason why this page should be deleted, A wiki page about a company will talk about the company how can you even say it is self promotional.Premkumariyer (talk) 09:36, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as corporate spam. The project should not be allowing WP:BOGOF articles, written by paid contributors. This wastes volunteer editors' time and results in articles on non notable subjects in the bargain. This only encourages spammers. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:03, 8 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.