Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GrIDsure


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 05:47, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

GrIDsure

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article has been tagged with multiple issues for months, and does indeed read like an ad for something that is at best marginally notable. An anon blanked it and replaced contents with "delete", rather than bring it here, which I am doing... Carlossuarez46 (talk) 14:38, 27 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Appears to be heavily promoted vaporware that fizzled out about two years ago. At the very least it needs a major anti-advertisement cleaning. - Eldereft (cont.) 05:58, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  xDanielx  T/C\R 03:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:NTEMP and WP:ATD. The article, right now, does not read like an advertisement and in fact cites both strenths and weaknesses of the subject itself and of independent studies done of the subject. The fact that the subject is vaporware cannot be used as reason for deletion because that fact does not mean the subject fails notability, per WP:NTEMP. Per WP:NTEMP, the subject may in fact be notable since a brief search on google yields many independent reviews. If anything, the article needs a good copy edit and more references, rather than an outright delete. --Samuel Tan (talk) 05:46, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - crappy in its present form, but meets the notability test (even if it is vaporware). Deletion is not justifiable with the sources provided; but the current article must be stubbed and rebuilt. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  16:13, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.