Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grabertising


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Scientizzle 16:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Grabertising

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Promotional neologism (see WP:NEOLOGISM) Delicious carbuncle (talk) 07:10, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete borderline speedy as spam. JuJube (talk) 08:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, advertising. Harland1 (t/c) 10:19, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Marketing-speak neologism. DarkAudit (talk) 13:17, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination: not a notable neologism, stealth spam, and a coatrack article intended to promote a specific business. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:07, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * In retrospect, delete, however I feel there should be an article on shopping cart advertising. Note that this was profiled in Marketing Magazine, the premier publication in Canada for the industry. --  Zanimum (talk) 14:33, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Why was it not deleted three years ago, when the article was first created? I simply stated that this is a neologism and has only Canadian examples.  In other words, this is not notable.  I have found this article only accidentally, since it originally does not have links to this article and I found this article from the "What links here" link on the Longos (supermarket chain) article. When this article is deleted, please remove references to it in the Advertising article, as well as in the Limited geographic scope page. Johnny Au (talk) 16:34, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no references, little context and only 74 google hits. Non-notable term, although the idea behind it may warrant an article, or at least a mention on Shopping cart. Think outside the box 17:36, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  16:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Spam, WP:NEOLOGISM, no references, - M ilks  F 'avorite  C ookie  22:34, 31 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.