Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grace (Singapore Chinese Christian) Church


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:11, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Grace (Singapore Chinese Christian) Church

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

It does not meet WP:GNG, WP:CSD. This article is about a non-notable worship centre. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Seems like advertisement to me. Relevant Policies and Guidelines:
 * 1) WP:LOTSOFSOURCES ← Whilst showing the subject is mentioned in a number of sources, not all sources are reliable and may only be trivial mentions.
 * 2) WP:NOTABILITY
 * 3) WP:VERIFIABILITY Mrt3366   (Talk?)   10:58, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. 16:50, 15 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. 16:50, 15 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. 16:52, 15 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 15 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: While I declined the speedy deletion placed on the article, I don't think this church meets WP:GNG or WP:ORG. I can't find any online or news sources. It's possible that sources do exist, but are in Chinese (since services are held in Cantonese and Mandarin). If anyone can find sufficient sources, I'll change my comments here. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:10, 16 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - 1300 members (as stated in the article) is large for a church, but not notably large -- there are no doubt thousands or more of similarly sized churches in the world. It also has a reasonably long history, although not always under this name -- length of existence is another consideration under WP:NONPROFIT.  But it's not particularly long in terms of churches and religious organizations.  None of the other facts specified in the article suggest notability under WP:NONPROFIT.   So, I would say non-notable.  --Lquilter (talk) 13:38, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep -- This potentially a well-written objective article free of advertising, but it lacks references. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:31, 19 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.