Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grace Bay Resorts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 11:43, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Grace Bay Resorts

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Yes, there's information and sources but there's also still an overall advert environment and my own searches at News have found exactly this, either exact PR or hinting PR with it either being republished or simply PR speak. I'm not seeing the confident convincing this would need to be acceptable, mere awards are still questionable when it comes to removing the advert environment and questionability overall. I had been watching this article for some time and frankly it should've been nominated sooner. Inviting who has a long history with these kinds of articles. SwisterTwister  talk  02:15, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. The usual reason: borderline notability plus clear promotionalism, which in combination is an excellent   reason for deletion . Small variations to the notability standard either way do not fundamentally harm the encycopedia, but accepting articles that are part of a promotional campaign causes great damage. Once we become a vehicle for promotion, we're useless as an encyclopedia   DGG ( talk ) 02:54, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:22, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:22, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  01:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete there are some hints of notability, but the overwhelming about of PR-type sources (awards pages, trivial mentions, etc.) hint that this is indeed an nothing more than a promotional entry. News Team   Assemble!  [talk?] 11:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.